From: "James R. Leu" <jleu@mindspring.com>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: Ramon Casellas <casellas@infres.enst.fr>,
Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
mpls-linux-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Porting MPLS-Linux to 2.6 (2.6.0-test9-bk22) comments welcome.
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 10:13:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031123161254.GE22638@mindspring.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1069601291.1055.2663.camel@jzny.localdomain>
I can start a 'mpls-linux-devel' mailing list over at SF if you would like.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 10:28:11AM -0500, jamal wrote:
>
> Not sure if i wanna see another xxtable or netfilter hook in there just
> so we can do an LSP ping. I have some ideas, so I dont wanna see the
> patch incase it influences me; lets discuss later and if it turns out
> netfilter is the better way to go then we will take that path.
> Heres what i will do: I am going to write a design description since
> there is enough interest.
> The discussion belongs to a small list of interested people not netdev.
> Anyone willing to create a small mailing list? Make sure you subscribe
> DaveM.
> This way i can ask for help from people to do coding instead of being
> the bottleneck.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> I am gonna start working on the doc about _NOW_ ; i should have
> something late today or early tommorow.
>
>
> On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 08:13, Ramon Casellas wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Harald Welte wrote:
> >
> > > now that is interesting. I have a working patch for adding netfilter
> > > hooks to the old MPLS stack. If your rewrite doesn't yet have some,
> > > I'll gladly add them.
> > >
> > > I also have a working implementation of the draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-01
> > > based on the netfilter hooks for James Leu's MPLS implementation, btw.
> >
> > Hi Harald,
> >
> > Thanks for your anwser.
> >
> > Some details:
> >
> > * Jamal and Dave are working on something. As soon as they release the
> > code we can get a whole picture of the state of the project. I don't know
> > the extent of their rewrite. Maybe jamal and/or Dave can give us an
> > overview of their changes. We'll see.
> >
> > * In the meantime, we are syncing efforts with James. Right know we have a
> > patch that applies to test9. It has mostly been a RFC (Rewrite, Format and
> > Comment). What I did was:
> > - Format the existing code, add comments for each function, start
> > documenting, clean up unneeded local variables, conform to C90
> > - Rewrite the procfs implementation to use seq_files (I've tested a
> > little and works)
> > - Clean up the "tunnel" module.
> > it compiles, boots and the entries are created in /proc/net/mpls/*
> >
> > * Your netfilter and LSP Ping impl. patch would be must welcome. IIRC
> > correctly, James was also working on netfilter (I haven't, so I CC'ed him
> > here). James, can you give us an overview of that?
> >
> > * I'm waiting (should come in some days) for James to commit my latest
> > changes to the P4 repository.
> >
> > * CVS and sourceforge releases are out of date. We have two
> > possibilities: either you set up a p4 client and wait for James commit, or
> > I can provide you with a unified diff for 2.6.0-test9 using my private
> > copy.
> >
> > However, I would be glad to take a look at your patches, even if they
> > apply to the old code.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> >
> >
> > // -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > // Ramon Casellas - GET/ENST/INFRES/RHD/A508 - casellas@infres.enst.fr
> > // 37/39 rue Dareau 75014 Paris -- http://perso.enst.fr/~casellas
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
James R. Leu
jleu@mindspring.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-23 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-17 23:58 [ANNOUNCE] Porting MPLS-Linux to 2.6 (2.6.0-test9-bk22) comments welcome Ramon Casellas
2003-11-18 3:26 ` jamal
2003-11-18 7:48 ` Ramon Casellas
2003-11-19 14:52 ` jamal
2003-11-22 8:55 ` Harald Welte
2003-11-23 13:13 ` Ramon Casellas
2003-11-23 15:28 ` jamal
2003-11-23 16:13 ` James R. Leu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031123161254.GE22638@mindspring.com \
--to=jleu@mindspring.com \
--cc=casellas@infres.enst.fr \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=mpls-linux-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).