netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Steve Hill <steve@navaho.co.uk>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test9 : bridge freezes
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:17:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031215171732.4877acd1.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312151304350.8670-200000@sorbus2.navaho>

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:15:44 +0000 (GMT)
Steve Hill <steve@navaho.co.uk> wrote:

> The memory that is leaking seems to be being allocated on line 299 on
> net/bridge/br_netfilter.c:
> 
>         if ((nf_bridge = nf_bridge_alloc(skb)) == NULL)
>                 return NF_DROP;
> 
> Only the first fragment gets freed later on.

I see.

> The patch attached fixes the problem by freeing nf_bridge when the 
> packets are defragmented, however I am sure this is not the right place 
> to do this.  Where would the skb's for the fragments usually get freed?
> 
> Bart De Schuymer suggested that they should be freed in 
> skbuff.c::skb_release_data(), but having looked at this it seems to do 
> this already.  skb_release_data() calls skb_drop_fraglist(), which does 
> kfree_skb() on each fragment, and kfree_skb calls nf_bridge_put correctly 
> so this isn't the problem.

There must be something in particular that the IPV4 fragmentation code
is doing that makes these fragment reference drops get forgotten.  Hmmm...

I just noticed that both bridge netfilter and IPV4 fragmentation make much
use of the skb->cb[] control block, this may be the true source of the
troubles.

In fact, since bridge netfilter expects pointers to be there, I'm surprised
this does not cause a crash.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-16  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-15 13:15 2.6.0-test9 : bridge freezes Steve Hill
2003-12-16  1:17 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-12-16  7:43   ` Bart De Schuymer
2003-12-16  7:46     ` David S. Miller
2003-12-16  9:00     ` Steve Hill
2003-12-16 21:46       ` Bart De Schuymer
2003-12-16 21:49         ` David S. Miller
2003-12-17  8:36         ` Steve Hill
2003-12-17 18:27           ` Bart De Schuymer
     [not found] <200311221527.UAA29684@eis.iisc.ernet.in>
2003-11-22 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-23 23:26   ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031215171732.4877acd1.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=steve@navaho.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).