From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: [PATCH-2.6.0-tiny] "uninline" {lock,release}_sock Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 05:54:27 -0200 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20031228075426.GB24351@conectiva.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linux Networking Development Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Return-path: To: Matt Mackall Content-Disposition: inline Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Matt, Please apply on top of your 2.6.0-tiny1 tree, CC to netdev for eventual comments. With this patch we save more 3.321 bytes. At a first compilation on top of plain 2.6.0 I thought I had seen it save more, will perhaps check this later... if you optimized some of the kernel primitives that are called by the current lock_sock/release_sock... Nah, too sleepy now :) Will test too with lock_sock/release_sock as an inline (or not if CONFIG_NET_SMALL is selected) and not as a macro as it is today, does anybody knows why it isn't already inline? Dave? /me must be missing something here... text data bss dec hex filename patch savings 858052 163460 65068 1086580 109474 vmlinux 2.6.0-tiny1 854697 163494 65068 1083259 10877b vmlinux lock_sock 3321 Best Regards, - Arnaldo diff -urp linux-2.6.0.tiny.orig/include/net/sock.h linux-2.6.0.tiny.acme/include/net/sock.h --- linux-2.6.0.tiny.orig/include/net/sock.h 2003-12-18 00:59:15.000000000 -0200 +++ linux-2.6.0.tiny.acme/include/net/sock.h 2003-12-28 01:32:50.000000000 -0200 @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static inline struct inode *SOCK_INODE(s extern void __lock_sock(struct sock *sk); extern void __release_sock(struct sock *sk); #define sock_owned_by_user(sk) ((sk)->sk_lock.owner) -#define lock_sock(__sk) \ +#define _lock_sock(__sk) \ do { might_sleep(); \ spin_lock_bh(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock)); \ if ((__sk)->sk_lock.owner) \ @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ do { might_sleep(); \ spin_unlock_bh(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock)); \ } while(0) -#define release_sock(__sk) \ +#define _release_sock(__sk) \ do { spin_lock_bh(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock)); \ if ((__sk)->sk_backlog.tail) \ __release_sock(__sk); \ @@ -561,6 +561,14 @@ do { spin_lock_bh(&((__sk)->sk_lock.sloc spin_unlock_bh(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock)); \ } while(0) +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SMALL +extern void lock_sock(struct sock *sk); +extern void release_sock(struct sock *sk); +#else +#define lock_sock(__sk) _lock_sock(__sk) +#define release_sock(__sk) _release_sock(__sk) +#endif + /* BH context may only use the following locking interface. */ #define bh_lock_sock(__sk) spin_lock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock)) #define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock)) diff -urp linux-2.6.0.tiny.orig/net/core/sock.c linux-2.6.0.tiny.acme/net/core/sock.c --- linux-2.6.0.tiny.orig/net/core/sock.c 2003-12-18 00:59:15.000000000 -0200 +++ linux-2.6.0.tiny.acme/net/core/sock.c 2003-12-28 01:32:50.000000000 -0200 @@ -1119,6 +1119,22 @@ void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, atomic_set(&sk->sk_refcnt, 1); } +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SMALL +void lock_sock(struct sock *sk) +{ + _lock_sock(sk); +} + +EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_sock); + +void release_sock(struct sock *sk) +{ + _release_sock(sk); +} + +EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock); +#endif + EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lock_sock); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__release_sock); EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_alloc);