From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [patch] clean up tcp_sk(), 2.6.0
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 11:12:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031231101207.GA7829@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031230144608.4c7e66f2.davem@redhat.com>
* David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:32:30 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > i recently wasted a few hours on a bug where i used "tcp_sk(sock)"
> > instead of "tcp_sk(sock->sk)" - the former, while being blatantly
> > incorrect, compiles just fine on 2.6.0. The patch below is equivalent to
> > the define but is also type-safe. Compiles cleanly & boots fine on
> > 2.6.0.
>
> Applied, and I'll happily accept patches for udp_sk() and all
> the other ones too :)
sure - patch for udp_sk, inet6_sk/raw6_sk and inet_sk attached. Compiles
cleanly and boots. The inet_sk one uncovered a couple of other bugs in
my code. (The other defines for protocol-private sockets seem to be safe
because they all use ->sk_protinfo which forces the type.)
Ingo
--- linux/include/linux/udp.h.orig
+++ linux/include/linux/udp.h
@@ -60,7 +60,10 @@ struct udp_sock {
struct udp_opt udp;
};
-#define udp_sk(__sk) (&((struct udp_sock *)__sk)->udp)
+static inline struct udp_opt * udp_sk(const struct sock *__sk)
+{
+ return &((struct udp_sock *)__sk)->udp;
+}
#endif
--- linux/include/linux/ipv6.h.orig
+++ linux/include/linux/ipv6.h
@@ -270,8 +270,15 @@ struct tcp6_sock {
struct ipv6_pinfo inet6;
};
-#define inet6_sk(__sk) ((struct raw6_sock *)__sk)->pinet6
-#define raw6_sk(__sk) (&((struct raw6_sock *)__sk)->raw6)
+static inline struct ipv6_pinfo * inet6_sk(const struct sock *__sk)
+{
+ return ((struct raw6_sock *)__sk)->pinet6;
+}
+
+static inline struct raw6_opt * raw6_sk(const struct sock *__sk)
+{
+ return &((struct raw6_sock *)__sk)->raw6;
+}
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
#define __ipv6_only_sock(sk) (inet6_sk(sk)->ipv6only)
--- linux/include/linux/ip.h.orig
+++ linux/include/linux/ip.h
@@ -159,7 +159,10 @@ struct inet_sock {
struct inet_opt inet;
};
-#define inet_sk(__sk) (&((struct inet_sock *)__sk)->inet)
+static inline struct inet_opt * inet_sk(const struct sock *__sk)
+{
+ return &((struct inet_sock *)__sk)->inet;
+}
#endif
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-31 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-30 16:32 [patch] clean up tcp_sk(), 2.6.0 Ingo Molnar
2003-12-30 16:50 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-12-30 16:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-12-30 22:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-12-31 10:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031231101207.GA7829@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).