From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:37:00 -0800 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040115113700.166ddfb0.davem@redhat.com> References: <20040116.041950.35757995.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xma@us.ibm.com, mashirle@us.ibm.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@" In-Reply-To: <20040116.041950.35757995.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:19:50 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@ wrote: > In article (at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:09:47 -0800), Shirley Ma says: > > > But if no applications use this value, and nothing is boken. It's not > > harmful to change the kernel to provide MIBs in as-is format. > > Shirley, nobody can prove that nothing will be broken. :-) And also, the current situation is OK as long as this value we present now can be converted into the desired value. Is this the case?