netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@colin2.muc.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com, jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de,
	hch@infradead.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless
Date: 19 Jan 2004 21:50:16 +0100
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:50:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040119205016.GA51807@colin2.muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040119122657.3b432583.davem@redhat.com>

> 1) they're a lot faster than their 64-bit counterparts
> 
> 2) they're a lot smaller than their 64-bit counterparts
> 
> 3) 64-bits buys them absolutely nothing

Just for the record: this doesn't apply to AMD64. While data structures
take a bit more memory at runtime the 64bit code is a lot better 
due to more registers and better ABI.  And it is also not signifcantly
bigger, in fact some programs get smaller when you recompile them for 
64bit.

Still good 32bit emulation is important because people expect 32bit
applications to run seamlessly on 64bit kernels.

> Therefore the 32-bit compatability layer must be as fully supportive as humanly
> possible.  Most 64-bit platforms still have %99 32-bit distributions.

AMD64 should usually run with 64bit userland, except for user who
transistion slowly from a 32bit user land.

-Andi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-19 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-19 12:33 [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless Andi Kleen
2004-01-19 12:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-19 13:10   ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-19 13:56     ` David S. Miller
2004-01-19 14:39       ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-19 14:39         ` David S. Miller
2004-01-19 14:54           ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-19 19:49             ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-01-19 20:01               ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-19 20:19                 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-01-19 20:26                   ` David S. Miller
2004-01-19 20:40                     ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-01-19 20:50                     ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-01-19 20:35                   ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-19 20:51                     ` Jean Tourrilhes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040119205016.GA51807@colin2.muc.de \
    --to=ak@colin2.muc.de \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).