From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srihari Vijayaraghavan Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] r8169 deadlocks Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:15:44 +1100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <200401212115.45027.harisri@bigpond.com> References: <200401152039.00182.harisri@bigpond.com> <200401202150.12892.harisri@bigpond.com> <20040120215230.A8935@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Francois Romieu In-Reply-To: <20040120215230.A8935@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Content-Disposition: inline Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hello Francois, On Wednesday 21 January 2004 07:52, Francois Romieu wrote: > [snip] > $ cat>foo< tar jxf linux-2.6.0.tar.bz2 > bunzip2 -c patch-2.6.1.bz2 | patch -p1 -d linux-2.6.0 > bunzip2 -c patch-2.6.1-bk2.bz2 | patch -p1 -d linux-2.6.0 > bunzip2 -c 2.6.1-bk1-netdev4.patch.bz2 | patch -p1 -d linux-2.6.0 > wget > http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/r8169-tx-index-overflow.patch > EOD > $ sh foo > [...] > $ patch -p1 -d linux-2.6.0 < r8169-tx-index-overflow.patch > patching file drivers/net/r8169.c > > Okay... > > $ md5sum r8169-tx-index-overflow.patch > 99b2f5886d6bf1d4df0f7553bb5bef57 r8169-tx-index-overflow.patch > > [...] Must be my mistake. Thanks for verifying things. > I did :o) > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > > (reason: 554 recipient exceeds mailbox storage > quota) :-) I apologies for that. God save me from the Spammers! > > under 32 bit kernel (vanilla Fedora + 2.6.1-mm4) in which it survives my > > torture test (I have verified for no more than 5 minutes though, but then > > it does not survive for more than 5 secs under the 64 bit kernel). > > Point taken. I have a good news: I checked out things as usual under vanilla linux-2.6.2-rc1, and to my surprise Kernel does not hang anymore :-). (although Tx counter not incrementing is altogether another problem). If you want me to I can test your r8169-tc-index-overflow.patch. Thanks Hari