From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vojtech Pavlik Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2.4] forcedeth network driver Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 23:46:35 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040124224635.GA3448@ucw.cz> References: <4012BF44.9@colorfullife.com> <4012D3C6.1050805@pobox.com> <20040124220545.GA3246@ucw.cz> <4012F2B7.3080800@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Garzik , Manfred Spraul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Netdev Return-path: To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4012F2B7.3080800@gmx.net> List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:33:27PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >>>Do you have specs that show that all nForce versions support unaligned > >>>buffers? skb_reserve is a performance feature, I don't want to add it > >>>yet. Testing that it works is on our TODO list. > >> > >>hmmmm, is nForce ever found on non-x86 boxes? I would think that > >>skb_reserve might be -required- for some platforms. > > > > > > AMD64 and PPC64 as far as I know. But you may consider the first one > > still a x86 box. > > Hmmm. I thought only GeForce graphics were available on PPC64 and nForce > mainboard chipsets (including the onboard nic) were not. Well, my memory may be tricking me (I'm not really sure about this), but I remember there was supposed to be a PPC64 northbridge with a HT link, made exactly for the purpose of connecting an nForce southrbridge to it. But it definitely is not in production yet. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR