From: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to 2.6
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:21:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040125202148.GA10599@usr.lcm.msu.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1075058539.1747.92.camel@jzny.localdomain>
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 02:22:19PM -0500, jamal wrote:
>
> There has been no real good reason as to why IMQ is needed to begin
> with. It may be easy to use and has been highly publized (which is
> always a dangerous thing in Linux).
>
> Maybe lets take a step back and see how people use it. How and why do
> you use IMQ? Is this because you couldnt use the ingress qdisc?
Think multiple clients connected via PPP. I want to shape traffic,
so ingress is out of question. I want different clients in a same
htb class, so using qdisc on each ppp interface is out of
question. It seems to me that IMQ is the only way to achieve my goals.
> Note, the abstraction to begin with is in the wrong place - it sure is
> an easy and nice looking hack. So is the current ingress qdisc, but we
> are laying that to rest with TC extensions.
>
>
~
:wq
With best regards,
Vladimir Savkin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-25 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-25 15:24 [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to 2.6 Marcel Sebek
2004-01-25 16:44 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-25 19:22 ` jamal
2004-01-25 20:21 ` Vladimir B. Savkin [this message]
2004-01-25 23:45 ` jamal
2004-01-26 0:11 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2004-01-26 3:09 ` jamal
2004-01-26 9:32 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2004-01-26 13:38 ` jamal
2004-01-26 13:55 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2004-01-26 14:29 ` jamal
2004-01-26 17:41 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2004-01-27 3:25 ` jamal
2004-01-31 18:52 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2004-01-31 20:26 ` jamal
2004-01-31 20:53 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2004-01-31 21:25 ` jamal
2004-01-31 21:32 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2004-01-31 21:49 ` jamal
2004-01-31 21:58 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2004-01-31 22:26 ` jamal
2004-04-11 19:32 ` (Long) ANNOUNCE: IMQ replacement WAS(Re: " jamal
2004-01-26 15:24 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-27 3:14 ` jamal
2004-01-27 11:59 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-31 17:02 ` jamal
2004-01-25 19:25 ` David S. Miller
2004-01-25 20:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-01-25 21:55 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040125202148.GA10599@usr.lcm.msu.ru \
--to=master@sectorb.msk.ru \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).