From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: altq HFSC port
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:58:00 -0800
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20040128145800.5ec4b57b.davem@redhat.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.42.0401261228290.22399-200000@stinky.trash.net>
	<1075128375.1746.392.camel@jzny.localdomain>
	<40155F1A.7070507@trash.net>
	<20040126235957.GA30186@mail.shareable.org>
	<4017C54D.2060607@trash.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: jamie@shareable.org, hadi@cyberus.ca, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
        linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
In-Reply-To: <4017C54D.2060607@trash.net>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:21:01 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:

> As the GPL specifically states that "identifable sections"
> retain their license, I guess their is no need to repeat it
> in the source file. Regarding the politeness (I don't want
> to be impolite), the authors are informed and support getting
> HFSC into Linux.
> 
> Dave, is that good enough for you ?

Yes, it is.  Please if you could resubmit the patch to me under
seperate cover, that would be great.  I recall it was for 2.6.x,
but if you could procure also a 2.4.x version I'll happily add it.
These are like drivers so it'd be totally safe.