* Bad UDP checksum with 82540EM
@ 2004-02-07 13:35 Andreas Schwab
2004-02-07 21:37 ` Jon D Mason
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2004-02-07 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cramerj; +Cc: netdev
I'm getting bad UPD checksums in outgoing packets with the e1000 driver
(version 5.2.16) in 2.6.1 when using HW checksumming on a HP branded
82540EM on ia64 (TCP works fine). The same driver works fine with an
Intel branded chip. The two devices are identified as follows:
Model: "Hewlett-Packard Company 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller"
Vendor: pci 0x8086 "Intel Corporation"
Device: pci 0x100e "82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller"
SubVendor: pci 0x103c "Hewlett-Packard Company"
SubDevice: pci 0x1274
Model: "Intel 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller"
Vendor: pci 0x8086 "Intel Corporation"
Device: pci 0x100e "82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller"
SubVendor: pci 0x8086 "Intel Corporation"
SubDevice: pci 0x3402
After disabling tx-checksumming UDP is working again.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bad UDP checksum with 82540EM
2004-02-07 13:35 Bad UDP checksum with 82540EM Andreas Schwab
@ 2004-02-07 21:37 ` Jon D Mason
2004-02-07 22:42 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jon D Mason @ 2004-02-07 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Schwab; +Cc: cramerj, netdev, netdev-bounce
This probably isn't helpful, but it sounds like a hardware error. Is the
error occurring on multiple/all HP adapters, or only one?
Also, your driver code is old, the latest is 5.2.30.1 (goto
http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/). I don't think that has anything
to do with it though.
Jon Mason jonmason@us.ibm.com
Software Engineer Phone:(512)838.4162
Linux eServer I/O Fax: (512)838.3509
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bad UDP checksum with 82540EM
2004-02-07 21:37 ` Jon D Mason
@ 2004-02-07 22:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-02-08 6:46 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2004-02-07 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon D Mason; +Cc: cramerj, netdev, netdev-bounce
Jon D Mason <jonmason@us.ibm.com> writes:
> This probably isn't helpful, but it sounds like a hardware error. Is the
> error occurring on multiple/all HP adapters, or only one?
I've also seen it with a HP branded BCM5701 on IA64, but also with a
Broadcom BCM5702 on AMD64 (both using the tg3 driver). It seems like
broken UDP checksumming is rather common. :-(
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bad UDP checksum with 82540EM
2004-02-07 22:42 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2004-02-08 6:46 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-08 13:09 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2004-02-08 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Schwab; +Cc: jonmason, cramerj, netdev, netdev-bounce
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 23:42:21 +0100
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
> Jon D Mason <jonmason@us.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > This probably isn't helpful, but it sounds like a hardware error. Is the
> > error occurring on multiple/all HP adapters, or only one?
>
> I've also seen it with a HP branded BCM5701 on IA64, but also with a
> Broadcom BCM5702 on AMD64 (both using the tg3 driver). It seems like
> broken UDP checksumming is rather common. :-(
It could be still a software bug. When hardware checksumming is available
the UDP packets use a slightly different path through the stack.
Could you perhaps test if the problem occurs in a 32bit box with the
same NIC ? Maybe it is some 64bit problem somewhere in software.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bad UDP checksum with 82540EM
2004-02-08 6:46 ` Andi Kleen
@ 2004-02-08 13:09 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2004-02-08 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: jonmason, cramerj, netdev, netdev-bounce
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes:
> On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 23:42:21 +0100
> Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
>
>> Jon D Mason <jonmason@us.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>> > This probably isn't helpful, but it sounds like a hardware error. Is the
>> > error occurring on multiple/all HP adapters, or only one?
>>
>> I've also seen it with a HP branded BCM5701 on IA64, but also with a
>> Broadcom BCM5702 on AMD64 (both using the tg3 driver). It seems like
>> broken UDP checksumming is rather common. :-(
>
> It could be still a software bug. When hardware checksumming is available
> the UDP packets use a slightly different path through the stack.
>
> Could you perhaps test if the problem occurs in a 32bit box with the
> same NIC ? Maybe it is some 64bit problem somewhere in software.
Just tested with a "3Com 3C996B-T 1000Base-T" (BCM5701 based, with tg3
driver) on an Athlon. It shows the same bug, and disabling HW
checksumming on tx fixes it. So it doesn't look like a 64bit issue.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <101E0EB68A545748974019DC227C554007CBDD@orsmsx406.jf.intel.com>]
* Re: Bad UDP checksum with 82540EM
[not found] <101E0EB68A545748974019DC227C554007CBDD@orsmsx406.jf.intel.com>
@ 2004-02-09 0:50 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2004-02-09 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cramerj; +Cc: Andi Kleen, jonmason, netdev
"cramerj" <cramerj@intel.com> writes:
> Just for clarification...how are you determining a bad checksum? Are
> you using tcpdump/ethereal on those test machines (that you're
> transmitting from), or are you capturing packets on the wire (from some
> other system receiving the packets).
Actually both. I have first noticed the issue because my DHCP clients
didn't accept the answers from the server.
> If the former, then please see the following thread.
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=107422099800006&r=1&w=2
>
> Is this perhaps the issue you're seeing?
I just double checked, the packets are really going out with a bad
checksum.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-09 0:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-07 13:35 Bad UDP checksum with 82540EM Andreas Schwab
2004-02-07 21:37 ` Jon D Mason
2004-02-07 22:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-02-08 6:46 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-08 13:09 ` Andreas Schwab
[not found] <101E0EB68A545748974019DC227C554007CBDD@orsmsx406.jf.intel.com>
2004-02-09 0:50 ` Andreas Schwab
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).