From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Kirch Subject: Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on for rpciod Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:18:08 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040210091808.GE20932@suse.de> References: <20040207144405.GA19416@lst.de> <20040209102801.GC21364@suse.de> <40283952.6093F19D@melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: Christoph Hellwig , netdev@oss.sgi.com, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: To: Greg Banks Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40283952.6093F19D@melbourne.sgi.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:52:18PM +1100, Greg Banks wrote: > Yes but it's worth doing, especially serverside. I won't argue that point. But I've had to deal with the fall-out from "oh-well-they-seem-to-work-here" type of NFS BKL removal patches, so I'm quite wary of adding anything at this point in the game :) Olaf -- Olaf Kirch | Stop wasting entropy - start using predictable okir@suse.de | tempfile names today! ---------------+