From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: kaber@trash.net, qnex@atlantis.knm.org.pl, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
shemminger@osdl.org
Subject: Re: 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:49:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040214124958.499294a6.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1076766981.1059.16.camel@jzny.localdomain>
On 14 Feb 2004 08:56:21 -0500
jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote:
> And the closest to a sane patch in 30 secs that compiles is attached
> to describe the idea.
I don't know how wise this tx_queue_len fiddling is.
With this, if user modifies tx_queue_len himself, on ifdown this configuration
change is lost if user sets it explicitly to '1'. See? In fact you could
call it corruption :-)
I think Alexey maybe meant something different, achieving the ends by some other
means than directly fiddling with tx_queue_len.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-14 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402101324350.810-100000@atlantis.knm.org.pl>
2004-02-12 4:05 ` 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP David S. Miller
2004-02-12 4:51 ` jamal
2004-02-12 4:59 ` jamal
2004-02-12 5:04 ` jamal
2004-02-12 5:15 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-12 5:25 ` jamal
2004-02-12 5:43 ` jamal
2004-02-12 5:51 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-12 6:09 ` jamal
2004-02-12 6:22 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <402D54D6.5070708@trash.net>
2004-02-14 5:36 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-14 12:45 ` jamal
2004-02-14 13:06 ` jamal
2004-02-14 13:56 ` jamal
2004-02-14 20:49 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-02-15 10:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-02-18 3:10 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-18 11:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-02-18 21:22 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040214124958.499294a6.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=qnex@atlantis.knm.org.pl \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).