From: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix checksum bug for multicast/broadcast packets on postrouting hook
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:54:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040217155452.GA9464@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0402142314580.7364-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1450 bytes --]
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:09:23AM -0500, James Morris wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>
> > James Morris wrote:
> >
> > >The proposed solution below is to copy the skb rather than clone it, to
> > >ensure that the original and looped back packets are independent.
> > >
> >
> > This is unneeded overhead for the common case. The right fix is to make
> > sure the modifier (netfilter etc) makes the copy if needed. Actually,
> > this is what skb_ip_make_writable() is doing.
>
> The common case here will be only for locally generated multicast and
> broadcast packets.
>
> If the netfilter core code is modified instead, we will end up adding
> skb_ip_make_writable() to nf_hook_slow() which will be called for every
> packet with an output device which uses hardware checksums.
>
> Not sure which is worse, but here's a proposed patch which does this.
Why can't we somehow check inside the netfilter hook if the packet is
at least multicast/broadcast (or even better: also locally generated)?
> - James
> James Morris
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-17 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-14 18:37 [PATCH] Fix checksum bug for multicast/broadcast packets on postrouting hook James Morris
2004-02-14 18:37 ` Harald Welte
2004-02-14 19:07 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-02-14 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-15 6:09 ` James Morris
2004-02-15 9:34 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-02-15 13:03 ` James Morris
2004-02-15 13:40 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-02-15 14:03 ` James Morris
2004-02-15 16:00 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-02-16 1:50 ` James Morris
2004-02-16 6:43 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-02-16 13:45 ` James Morris
2004-02-19 1:24 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-23 22:19 ` James Morris
2004-02-29 5:50 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-17 15:54 ` Harald Welte [this message]
2004-02-17 20:35 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040217155452.GA9464@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org \
--to=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).