From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Kirch Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:32:34 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040224093234.GB7886@suse.de> References: <20040217121726.GD8554@suse.de> <20040221130853.4c98bad6.davem@redhat.com> <20040223094209.GA12663@suse.de> <20040223094216.66602afd.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040223094216.66602afd.davem@redhat.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:42:16AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > Therefore, the only bug was returning -EAGAIN unconditionally and that's > what is fixed by the correct half of your changes. > > TCP does the same thing Olaf, and there is no way I'm adding the gross poll > hacks there :-) Okay, I can live with that. I will push this info to our posix guys and let them chew on it. UDPv6 needs the exact same fix BTW. Cheers, Olaf -- Olaf Kirch | Stop wasting entropy - start using predictable okir@suse.de | tempfile names today! ---------------+