From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: kashyapv <kashyapv@us.ibm.com>
Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept()
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:17:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040225111719.4b99403a.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402251017510.3691-100000@dyn319495.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:07:48 -0800 (PST)
kashyapv <kashyapv@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Also, an in-kernel solution allows administrative control and tuning
> without affecting the applications at all. The administrator can as per
> the policy (which may change over time) modify the proportions using another
> interface. Otherwise, each application must provide a way to manage/modify
> its scheduler.
Since all of the classification we're suggesting is via the kernel, the
administrator has the same kinds of controls and it is also without any
application modifications.
We're saying, to classify packets so that they get prioritized however you
would have prioritized things in the accept queue (ie. mark SYN packets
with address X as having priority Y). The let the packet scheduler or
netfilter take care of the rest.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-25 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 16:43 [PATCH] proportional share accept() Vivek Kashyap
2004-02-25 17:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-02-25 18:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-25 19:07 ` kashyapv
2004-02-25 19:17 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-02-25 19:30 ` kashyapv
2004-02-26 22:08 ` Ronghua Zhang
2004-02-27 22:13 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-04 20:51 ` Vivek Kashyap
2004-03-04 21:52 ` Ronghua Zhang
2004-03-01 6:05 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-01 10:11 ` Vivek Kashyap
[not found] ` <Pine.WNT.4.44.0402251101300.1572-100000@w-vkashyap95.des.sequent.com>
2004-02-25 20:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-02-25 22:31 ` kashyapv
2004-02-26 2:35 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040225111719.4b99403a.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=kashyapv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).