From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:42:45 -0800
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20040226124245.5b3c77bf.davem@redhat.com>
References: <20040223105359.GA91938@colin2.muc.de>
	<20040223.200101.39143636.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
	<20040223111659.GB10681@colin2.muc.de>
	<20040223.203843.04073965.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
	<20040223102613.33838132.davem@redhat.com>
	<20040225211526.74478066.ak@suse.de>
	<20040223133233.71eecc99.davem@redhat.com>
	<20040226194900.GA8230@colin2.muc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ak@suse.de, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, ak@muc.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
In-Reply-To: <20040226194900.GA8230@colin2.muc.de>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On 26 Feb 2004 20:49:00 +0100
Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> wrote:

> I don't think it should be only sized for big datagrams and other obscure cases.
> Better is a reasonable default to fit at least 64K of data with a standard MTU like ~1.4K. 
> Or may resize it on MTU change, but I'm not sure that's worth the effort. 
> 
> Are you working on this or should I prepare a new patch? 

Let's just leave things how we've changed them, and when people complain
about jumbo MTU ipv6 icmp messages we'll address it.

Thanks.