From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe Date: 26 Feb 2004 21:52:20 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040226205220.GA29457@colin2.muc.de> References: <20040223105359.GA91938@colin2.muc.de> <20040223.200101.39143636.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20040223111659.GB10681@colin2.muc.de> <20040223.203843.04073965.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20040223102613.33838132.davem@redhat.com> <20040225211526.74478066.ak@suse.de> <20040223133233.71eecc99.davem@redhat.com> <20040226194900.GA8230@colin2.muc.de> <20040226124245.5b3c77bf.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , ak@suse.de, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:52:20 +0100 To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040226124245.5b3c77bf.davem@redhat.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 12:42:45PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > On 26 Feb 2004 20:49:00 +0100 > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > I don't think it should be only sized for big datagrams and other obscure cases. > > Better is a reasonable default to fit at least 64K of data with a standard MTU like ~1.4K. > > Or may resize it on MTU change, but I'm not sure that's worth the effort. > > > > Are you working on this or should I prepare a new patch? > > Let's just leave things how we've changed them, and when people complain > about jumbo MTU ipv6 icmp messages we'll address it. Ah, I missed that you already checked it in. Sorry for the noise. I will test now if your change really fixes the DSL performance problem. -Andi