From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [janitor] remove casts in drivers/net/arm/ Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:36:04 +0000 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040302193604.G12353@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20040229142516.3d218ed0.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20040229143436.4bb884ee.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20040302121042.A9931@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <4044D86C.70709@pobox.com> <20040302110237.0f580736.rddunlap@osdl.org> <4044DB78.7040309@pobox.com> <20040302111700.76c0b381.rddunlap@osdl.org> <4044E07E.8000409@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Jeff Garzik Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4044E07E.8000409@pobox.com>; from jgarzik@pobox.com on Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:29:02PM -0500 Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:29:02PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I wasn't rejecting your patches. > > In fact, I want to apply your cast patches separate from any > netdev_priv() cleanup. > > netdev_priv() should be a separate item on the janitor todo list. > > RMK however is free to reject these patches for drivers/net/arm/ of > course... I'm easy - I probably won't look at this until post-2.6.4 anyway. However, it seems a bit silly to produce two patches changing the exact same lines when one patch would do. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core