netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Vegas and tcp parameters per route
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:37:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040315133708.08f6b900.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040315133034.487caee1@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:30:34 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> wrote:

> > How do you propose to support some kind of "global enable" for features.
> 
> The easiest way to do that is to initialize each TP with features from
> sysctl when created.

Right.

> > I think sysctl's support this quite well.  The test for the feature
> > becomes "sysctl || route_attribute".
> 
> That is what the next version does for FRTO.

OK, but do not limit it to FRTO, I think all TCP features should
be handle'able this way.

Actually, this is a problem with using an RTAX_* that is a bitmask
or single binary.  You need a "don't care" value, and thus effectively
a trinary route entry state to do this properly.  Right?

In this way, you have a global default, but you can also FORCE something
off per-route.  People can work-around ECN-fux0red sites without obviating
ECN completely.

Or perhaps you can come up with another method by which to achieve this?

> Okay, what about WESTWOOD?
 ...
> What about tcp_westwood which is new?

Just don't change sysctl numbers, even we keep them perfectly sync'd between
2.6.x and 2.4.x sources.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-15 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-12 23:17 [RFC] Vegas and tcp parameters per route Stephen Hemminger
2004-03-13  6:41 ` Pasi Sarolahti
2004-03-15 17:20   ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-03-15 21:22     ` David S. Miller
2004-03-15 21:29       ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-15 21:30       ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-03-15 21:37         ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-03-15 17:38 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040315133708.08f6b900.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).