* [PATCH] C99 initializers for net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c
@ 2004-03-16 18:56 Art Haas
2004-03-16 19:57 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Art Haas @ 2004-03-16 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wensong Zhang, David S. Miller; +Cc: netdev, linux-net
Hi.
Here's the last of the three patches adding C99 initializers. This patch
splits a structure up, and is against the current BK.
Art Haas
===== net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c 1.8 vs edited =====
--- 1.8/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c Wed Feb 18 15:03:53 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c Tue Mar 16 11:49:49 2004
@@ -297,29 +297,50 @@
/*
* IPVS LBLCR sysctl table
*/
-struct ip_vs_lblcr_sysctl_table {
- struct ctl_table_header *sysctl_header;
- ctl_table vs_vars[2];
- ctl_table vs_dir[2];
- ctl_table ipv4_dir[2];
- ctl_table root_dir[2];
+
+static ctl_table vs_vars_table[] = {
+ {
+ .ctl_name = NET_IPV4_VS_LBLCR_EXPIRE,
+ .procname = "lblcr_expiration",
+ .data = &sysctl_ip_vs_lblcr_expiration,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec_jiffies,
+ },
+ { .ctl_name = 0 }
+};
+
+static ctl_table vs_table[] = {
+ {
+ .ctl_name = NET_IPV4_VS,
+ .procname = "vs",
+ .mode = 0555,
+ .child = vs_vars_table
+ },
+ { .ctl_name = 0 }
};
+static ctl_table ipv4_table[] = {
+ {
+ .ctl_name = NET_IPV4,
+ .procname = "ipv4",
+ .mode = 0555,
+ .child = vs_table
+ },
+ { .ctl_name = 0 }
+};
-static struct ip_vs_lblcr_sysctl_table lblcr_sysctl_table = {
- NULL,
- {{NET_IPV4_VS_LBLCR_EXPIRE, "lblcr_expiration",
- &sysctl_ip_vs_lblcr_expiration,
- sizeof(int), 0644, NULL, &proc_dointvec_jiffies},
- {0}},
- {{NET_IPV4_VS, "vs", NULL, 0, 0555, lblcr_sysctl_table.vs_vars},
- {0}},
- {{NET_IPV4, "ipv4", NULL, 0, 0555, lblcr_sysctl_table.vs_dir},
- {0}},
- {{CTL_NET, "net", NULL, 0, 0555, lblcr_sysctl_table.ipv4_dir},
- {0}}
+static ctl_table lblcr_root_table[] = {
+ {
+ .ctl_name = CTL_NET,
+ .procname = "net",
+ .mode = 0555,
+ .child = ipv4_table
+ },
+ { .ctl_name = 0 }
};
+static struct ctl_table_header * sysctl_header;
/*
* new/free a ip_vs_lblcr_entry, which is a mapping of a destination
@@ -844,8 +865,7 @@
static int __init ip_vs_lblcr_init(void)
{
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ip_vs_lblcr_scheduler.n_list);
- lblcr_sysctl_table.sysctl_header =
- register_sysctl_table(lblcr_sysctl_table.root_dir, 0);
+ sysctl_header = register_sysctl_table(lblcr_root_table, 0);
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_LBLCR_DEBUG
proc_net_create("ip_vs_lblcr", 0, ip_vs_lblcr_getinfo);
#endif
@@ -858,7 +878,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_LBLCR_DEBUG
proc_net_remove("ip_vs_lblcr");
#endif
- unregister_sysctl_table(lblcr_sysctl_table.sysctl_header);
+ unregister_sysctl_table(sysctl_header);
unregister_ip_vs_scheduler(&ip_vs_lblcr_scheduler);
}
--
Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities
the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind.
-Thomas Jefferson to James Smith, 1822
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] C99 initializers for net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c
2004-03-16 18:56 [PATCH] C99 initializers for net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c Art Haas
@ 2004-03-16 19:57 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2004-03-16 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Art Haas; +Cc: wensong, netdev, linux-net
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:56:28 -0600
"Art Haas" <ahaas@airmail.net> wrote:
> Here's the last of the three patches adding C99 initializers. This patch
> splits a structure up, and is against the current BK.
Looks fine, thanks Art.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-16 19:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-16 18:56 [PATCH] C99 initializers for net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c Art Haas
2004-03-16 19:57 ` David S. Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).