From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Ian Campbell <icampbell@arcom.com>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:41:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040316194121.C7886@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403161133430.17272@ppc970.osdl.org>; from torvalds@osdl.org on Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:34:56AM -0800
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:34:56AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Russell King wrote:
> > >
> > > What are your thoughts on this?
> >
> > So how do we solve this problem. Should I just merge this change and
> > ask you to pull it? I think that's rather impolite though.
>
> I didn't apply the patch because you said it was untested ;)
Ok, but bear in mind that although I can test that removing linux/irq.h
from netpoll.h fixes my problem, it really needs an x86 person to also
test it, just in case there's some dependency there that may not show
up for me.
> I'll happily remove that irq.h include if it really doesn't do anything
> but break things. I'd feel happier about it if somebody said it has been
> tested, though ;)
Andi Kleen, hch and jgarzik are presently discussing the issue, and I
think they're convincing themselves that linux/irq.h is disgusting
mess.
As far as me doing anything with linux/irq.h, I think that's out of my
control because ARM doesn't use it - an x86 person needs to look into
fixing it properly.
So all I can do is moan each time this problem comes up until someone
gets pissed off enough to fix it properly.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-16 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-15 16:52 [PATCH] Do not include linux/irq.h from linux/netpoll.h Ian Campbell
2004-03-16 0:11 ` Russell King
2004-03-16 19:22 ` Russell King
2004-03-16 19:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-03-16 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-03-16 19:41 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-03-16 20:17 ` Russell King
2004-03-16 20:27 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040316194121.C7886@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=icampbell@arcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).