From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Volf Subject: Re: [LARTC] FWD IMQ mail on netdev Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:41:57 +0200 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040413194157.GA20599@martinpc.doma> References: <407B9ABF.60101@dsl.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: To: jamal Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <407B9ABF.60101@dsl.pipex.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > ----- Forwarded message from jamal ----- > > Subject: (Long) ANNOUNCE: IMQ replacement WAS(Re: [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to > 2.6 > From: jamal > Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca > To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" > Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com .. > I finally hacked dummy device as a good replacement (IMO) for IMQ. > I am only subscribed to netdev so if there are other lists which > are of interest to this subject please forward on, but make sure > responses make it to netdev. .. > What am i looking for? .. > 2) testing of the above by people who use IMQ Hello, I would like to test your patch. Can you please point me to the place, from which it can be downloaded? I have a terrible experience with Patrick McHardy's IMQ on NATing firewalls (kernel panics randomly etc) and a very good experience with the very same IMQ on an ethernet bridge (rock solid for one year). I can share the results of the test with netdev ml. Thanks! -- Martin Volf