From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Hariprasad Nellitheertha <hari@in.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
suparna@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Problem with Netpoll based netdumping and NAPI
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:42:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040419174254.GQ1175@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040419125148.GA4495@in.ibm.com>
[changed cc: from linux-net to netdev]
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 06:21:48PM +0530, Hariprasad Nellitheertha wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am facing a problem while trying to network dump using LKCD. My
> debugging so far indicates that this is due to both NAPI and NETPOLL
> being enabled.
>
> I am using LKCD on the 2.6.5 kernel and both the client and server are
> i386 boxes. The dumping machine has an e100 card. I have built the kernel
> with both CONFIG_E100_NAPI and CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER (and the other
> netpoll related options) selected.
>
> LKCD uses netpoll for its network dump implementation. The problem we see
> is that the network dump driver does not receive any packet from the
> card driver and hence dumping fails. In e100_intr(), we call
> netif_rx_schedule() if we are using the NAPI feature. netif_rx_schedule,
> in turn, ends up adding the processing of this packet to the NET_RX_SOFTIRQ
> softirq.
Netpoll should be manually calling the NAPI poll function like this
after calling the interrupt handler (in netpoll_poll()):
/* If scheduling is stopped, tickle NAPI bits */
if(trapped && np->dev->poll &&
test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &np->dev->state))
np->dev->poll(np->dev, &budget);
Please ensure that LKCD is calling netpoll_set_trap(1) which tells it
that packet scheduling is stopped.
I've tested this path primarily with tg3 and kgdb-over-ethernet, but
it should be functionally quite similar to e100 and lkcd.
--
Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-19 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040419125148.GA4495@in.ibm.com>
2004-04-19 17:42 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2004-04-21 6:00 ` Problem with Netpoll based netdumping and NAPI Hariprasad Nellitheertha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040419174254.GQ1175@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=hari@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).