From: Hariprasad Nellitheertha <hari@in.ibm.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
suparna@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Problem with Netpoll based netdumping and NAPI
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:30:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040421060021.GB3716@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040419174254.GQ1175@waste.org>
Hi Matt,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 12:42:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> [changed cc: from linux-net to netdev]
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 06:21:48PM +0530, Hariprasad Nellitheertha wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am facing a problem while trying to network dump using LKCD. My
> > debugging so far indicates that this is due to both NAPI and NETPOLL
> > being enabled.
> >
> > I am using LKCD on the 2.6.5 kernel and both the client and server are
> > i386 boxes. The dumping machine has an e100 card. I have built the kernel
> > with both CONFIG_E100_NAPI and CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER (and the other
> > netpoll related options) selected.
> >
> > LKCD uses netpoll for its network dump implementation. The problem we see
> > is that the network dump driver does not receive any packet from the
> > card driver and hence dumping fails. In e100_intr(), we call
> > netif_rx_schedule() if we are using the NAPI feature. netif_rx_schedule,
> > in turn, ends up adding the processing of this packet to the NET_RX_SOFTIRQ
> > softirq.
>
> Netpoll should be manually calling the NAPI poll function like this
> after calling the interrupt handler (in netpoll_poll()):
>
> /* If scheduling is stopped, tickle NAPI bits */
> if(trapped && np->dev->poll &&
> test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &np->dev->state))
> np->dev->poll(np->dev, &budget);
>
> Please ensure that LKCD is calling netpoll_set_trap(1) which tells it
> that packet scheduling is stopped.
This was indeed the problem. We were not calling netpoll_set_trap in LKCD.
Adding this fixed the problem. Thanks so much for your help with this.
Regards, Hari
>
> I've tested this path primarily with tg3 and kgdb-over-ethernet, but
> it should be functionally quite similar to e100 and lkcd.
>
> --
> Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting
--
Hariprasad Nellitheertha
Linux Technology Center
India Software Labs
IBM India, Bangalore
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-21 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040419125148.GA4495@in.ibm.com>
2004-04-19 17:42 ` Problem with Netpoll based netdumping and NAPI Matt Mackall
2004-04-21 6:00 ` Hariprasad Nellitheertha [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040421060021.GB3716@in.ibm.com \
--to=hari@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).