From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix arm/etherh.c allocation Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:33:42 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040422083342.A31406@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200404202049.09130.daniel.ritz@gmx.ch> <40873BEA.1040208@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: daniel.ritz@gmx.ch, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Jeff Garzik Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40873BEA.1040208@pobox.com>; from jgarzik@pobox.com on Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:28:42PM -0400 Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:28:42PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Daniel Ritz wrote: > > --- 1.23/drivers/net/arm/etherh.c Wed Apr 14 12:23:55 2004 > > +++ edited/etherh.c Tue Apr 20 20:39:04 2004 > > > can one of you resend something that applies with 'patch -sp1'? I've noticed this as well - I just end up fixing the patch headers manually. It's a BK bug unfortunately - if you provide a directory for bk diffs, it messes up like above, but if you give explicit files it doesn't. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core