From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: tun device - bug or feature? WAS(Re: IMQ / new Dummy device post. Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:38:06 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040425213806.1edb6681.davem@redhat.com> References: <1082427350.1034.70.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1082639764.1059.81.camel@jzny.localdomain> <87oepjx65r.87n053x65r@87llknx65r.message.id> <1082719745.1057.27.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1082816083.1054.32.camel@jzny.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, syrius.ml@no-log.org, maxk@qualcomm.com, jgarzik@pobox.com Return-path: To: hadi@cyberus.ca In-Reply-To: <1082816083.1054.32.camel@jzny.localdomain> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 24 Apr 2004 10:14:43 -0400 jamal wrote: > Jeff, Dave: Would it be fair to say when packets get injected into the > stack by a netdev via netif_rx(), the skb headers are expected to be > ponting into some specific places? I am not sure if theres a hard > fastened rule defined anywhere. What do ipv4 tunnels do? They merely modify 'nh' and 'mac' ".raw" and pass the packet in.