netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: MSEC_TO_JIFFIES is messed up...
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 17:39:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040512213913.GA16658@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405121400360.11950@bigblue.dev.mdolabs.com>

On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:01:58PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2004, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > the compiler cannot discard the multiplication and the division from the
> > following:
> > 
> > 	x * 1000 / 1000
> > 
> > due to overflows.
> 
> $ cat foo.c
> 
> int foo(int i) {
> 
> 
>         return i * 1000 / 1000;
> }

If gcc really optimizes that to just the identity function, then surely
that's a gcc bug?  Multiplication is left-associative, so i * 1000 /
1000 = (i * 1000) / 1000, but (i * 1000) should be zero for any i
divisible by i^(sizeof(int) - 12).

It shouldn't be able to optimize out the 1000 here for exactly the same
reason it shouldn't be able to optimize out the shifts in, e.g.,

	i << 12 >> 12

--Bruce Fields

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-12 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20040512020700.6f6aa61f.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found] ` <20040512181903.GG13421@kroah.com>
2004-05-12 18:42   ` MSEC_TO_JIFFIES is messed up Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 19:33     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 19:47       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 19:56         ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-12 20:07           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 20:28             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 20:35               ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 20:50                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 21:03                   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 21:33                     ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-12 21:07                   ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12 21:17                     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 22:18                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-13 17:38                         ` Paul Wagland
2004-05-13 19:11                           ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-13 19:19                             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-13 22:40                               ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-13 22:40                                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-13 22:41                                   ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-13 23:02                                     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-13 19:50                             ` Paul Wagland
2004-05-12 23:33           ` Peter Williams
2004-05-12 19:49       ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-12 20:03         ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 20:18           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 20:20           ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12 20:24             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 20:35               ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12 20:44                 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 21:03                 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2004-05-12 20:32             ` Greg KH
2004-05-12 20:38             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-12 20:47               ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12 20:58                 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 20:59                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-12 20:55             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 21:01           ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-12 21:12             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 21:40               ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-12 21:49               ` Zan Lynx
2004-05-12 22:05                 ` Roland Dreier
2004-05-12 21:56               ` Zan Lynx
2004-05-12 21:39             ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2004-05-12 21:55               ` Andreas Schwab
2004-05-12 22:07                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2004-05-16  3:48                 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-16 12:10                   ` Paul Wagland
2004-05-12 20:17       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 20:54     ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2004-05-12 22:44       ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2004-05-12 20:40 Jan Olderdissen
2004-05-12 20:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 20:49 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040512213913.GA16658@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).