From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Paul Wagland <paul@wagland.net>
Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jgarzik@pobox.com, mingo@elte.hu, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
davidel@xmailserver.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: MSEC_TO_JIFFIES is messed up...
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 12:11:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040513121141.37f32035.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61D92BA6-A504-11D8-BD91-000A95CD704C@wagland.net>
Paul Wagland <paul@wagland.net> wrote:
>
> > -#if HZ == 1000
> > -# define JIFFIES_TO_MSECS(x) (x)
> > -# define MSECS_TO_JIFFIES(x) (x)
> > -#elif HZ == 100
> > -# define JIFFIES_TO_MSECS(x) ((x) * 10)
> > -# define MSECS_TO_JIFFIES(x) (((x) + 9) / 10)
> > +#if HZ <= 1000 && !(1000 % HZ)
> > +# define JIFFIES_TO_MSECS(j) ((1000/HZ)*(j))
> > +# define MSECS_TO_JIFFIES(m) (((m) + (1000/HZ) - 1)/(1000/HZ))
> > +#elif HZ > 1000 && !(HZ % 1000)
> > +# define JIFFIES_TO_MSECS(j) (((j) + (HZ/1000) - 1)/(HZ/1000))
> > +# define MSECS_TO_JIFFIES(m) ((m)*(HZ/1000))
> > #else
> > # define JIFFIES_TO_MSECS(x) (((x) * 1000) / HZ)
> > # define MSECS_TO_JIFFIES(x) (((x) * HZ + 999) / 1000)
>
> Also, can we keep the same parameter name across all of the macros?
Fair enough.
--- 25/include/linux/time.h~MSEC_TO_JIFFIES-fixups-tidy 2004-05-13 12:09:27.463273344 -0700
+++ 25-akpm/include/linux/time.h 2004-05-13 12:09:41.300169816 -0700
@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ struct timezone {
# define JIFFIES_TO_MSECS(j) (((j) + (HZ/1000) - 1)/(HZ/1000))
# define MSECS_TO_JIFFIES(m) ((m)*(HZ/1000))
#else
-# define JIFFIES_TO_MSECS(x) (((x) * 1000) / HZ)
-# define MSECS_TO_JIFFIES(x) (((x) * HZ + 999) / 1000)
+# define JIFFIES_TO_MSECS(j) (((j) * 1000) / HZ)
+# define MSECS_TO_JIFFIES(m) (((m) * HZ + 999) / 1000)
#endif
/*
> This changes behaviour when HZ==(z)000
>
> JIFFIES_TO_MSECS goes from
> ((x) * 1000) / (z)000 to (((x) + (z) - 1)/(z))
>
> i.e. for x=1, z=2 this goes from ((1)*1000)/2000)=0 to (((1)+(2)-1)/2)=1
hm, so you're saying that we now round 0.5 up to 1 rather than down to zero?
> However, MSECS_TO_JIFFIES remains the same going from
> (((x) * (z)000 + 999) / 1000) to ((x)*(z))
>
> I.e. they basically reduce down to the same thing (modulo overflows)
>
> All of the other permuations look correct to me...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-13 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040512020700.6f6aa61f.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20040512181903.GG13421@kroah.com>
2004-05-12 18:42 ` MSEC_TO_JIFFIES is messed up Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 19:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 19:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 19:56 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-12 20:07 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 20:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 20:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 20:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 21:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 21:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-12 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 22:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-13 17:38 ` Paul Wagland
2004-05-13 19:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-05-13 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-13 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-13 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-13 22:41 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-13 23:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-13 19:50 ` Paul Wagland
2004-05-12 23:33 ` Peter Williams
2004-05-12 19:49 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-12 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 20:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-12 20:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12 20:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12 20:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 21:03 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2004-05-12 20:32 ` Greg KH
2004-05-12 20:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-12 20:47 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-12 20:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 20:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-12 20:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 21:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-12 21:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-12 21:40 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-05-12 21:49 ` Zan Lynx
2004-05-12 22:05 ` Roland Dreier
2004-05-12 21:56 ` Zan Lynx
2004-05-12 21:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2004-05-12 21:55 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-05-12 22:07 ` J. Bruce Fields
2004-05-16 3:48 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-16 12:10 ` Paul Wagland
2004-05-12 20:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 20:54 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2004-05-12 22:44 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2004-05-12 20:40 Jan Olderdissen
2004-05-12 20:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-12 20:49 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040513121141.37f32035.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=paul@wagland.net \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).