From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: bonding might sleep with lock held
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:04:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040513210445.3e08c1f4.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405131844.i4DIijD3018359@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>
On Thu, 13 May 2004 11:44:45 -0700
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> It will race against the timers, although I don't see anything
> in there offhand that would conflict. It just feels somehow unclean to
> do it without the lock.
Why should the timers care if there can be a packet received from the
network or not? (this is all what dev_remove_pack prevents)
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-13 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-13 2:15 PATCH: bonding might sleep with lock held Jay Vosburgh
2004-05-13 8:20 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-13 18:44 ` Jay Vosburgh
2004-05-13 19:04 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-05-13 19:34 ` Jay Vosburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040513210445.3e08c1f4.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).