From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] prism54: bring up to sync with prism54.org cvs rep
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:27:34 -0300
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20040527192733.GB14186@logos.cnet>
References: <20040524083003.GA3330@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <20040524085727.GR3330@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <40B62F29.6090101@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@studorgs.rutgers.edu>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, prism54-devel@prism54.org
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+linux-kernel=40quimby.gnus.org-S265075AbUE0T0B@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40B62F29.6090101@pobox.com>
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:10:49PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >BTW we can supply a 2.4 prism54 patch (as new driver). Would that be
> >wanted?
> 
> No objections here.
> 
> 2.4.x is vaguely closed, though, so Marcelo may not be interested in new 
> drivers.

IMO support for new hardware (new drivers) which dont break existing setups are fine.

Jeff, you are actively maintaining most of the network drivers in v2.4, if you are OK with the 
inclusion of this, I'm OK.

Does this make sense?