From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mcgrof@ruslug.rutgers.edu (Luis R. Rodriguez)
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/14] prism54: bring up to sync with prism54.org cvs rep
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:04:14 -0400
Sender: prism54-devel-admin@prism54.org
Message-ID: <20040527200414.GY3330@ruslug.rutgers.edu>
References: <20040524083003.GA3330@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <20040524085727.GR3330@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <40B62F29.6090101@pobox.com> <20040527192733.GB14186@logos.cnet> <40B6424D.7030203@pobox.com> <20040527194513.GV3330@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <40B647DB.4090109@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="P8euesIFFZ8+3pAQ"
Return-path: <prism54-devel-admin@prism54.org>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com, prism54-devel@prism54.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40B647DB.4090109@pobox.com>
Errors-To: prism54-devel-admin@prism54.org
List-Help: <mailto:prism54-devel-request@prism54.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:prism54-devel@prism54.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://prism54.org/mailman/listinfo/prism54-devel>,
	<mailto:prism54-devel-request@prism54.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://prism54.org/mailman/listinfo/prism54-devel>,
	<mailto:prism54-devel-request@prism54.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://prism54.org/pipermail/prism54-devel/>
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org


--P8euesIFFZ8+3pAQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 03:56:11PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >Great. I'll fix all those patches up again for you and Marcelo. For futu=
re
> >development I've asked other prism54 developers to first send patches to
>=20
> For what it's worth, you may send a "one big patch" to add the driver to=
=20
> 2.4, since the individual changes to that point will be in 2.6.x=20
> BitKeeper changelog.

Will do. My plan was for us to get the pathes for 2.6 all set. Once we
were all happy and our trees in sync we'd send a large 2.4 patch for
inclusion in 2.4

> Once the driver is merged, I do request split-up patches just like 2.6.x.

OK. Sure thing.

> >netdev for review/approval. Maybe we *should* do away with prism54-devel=
=20
> >mailing list and just use netdev as was once suggested by someone...
>=20
> Up to you :)

I think we should. Anyone against this? Please reply or else we'll just
move to netdev.

	Luis

--=20
GnuPG Key fingerprint =3D 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84  A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E

--P8euesIFFZ8+3pAQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAtkm+at1JN+IKUl4RAvaGAKCCwbWsyuCDOdqf4DtF//PzfMFwzQCgjjZf
pv8IAspFW86MdsmXVXBAHTI=
=H3Sj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--P8euesIFFZ8+3pAQ--