From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jouni Malinen Subject: Re: HostAP: alive or dead? Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 18:49:52 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040529014951.GE7535@jm.kir.nu> References: <40B62FD3.8040601@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Netdev Return-path: To: Jeff Garzik Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40B62FD3.8040601@pobox.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:13:39PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I've been wanting to merge it, and starting working on the generic > wireless layer, for a while now. Yes, it is very much alive. However.. I'm sorry I haven't been able to get enough time to work on finishing the cleanup I planned for 2.6 submission. Another IEEE 802.11 meeting and WPA2 testing took a lot of time during last weeks. Anyway, it looks like I might not need to travel anywhere during the following few weeks (well, at least I'm hoping ;-), so I could try to concentrate on this now. I'll try to get an initial submission for wireless-2.6 done over the weekend so that something becomes available for reviewing. What would be the best format for this? Would it be ok to send a patch against the current linus-2.5 tree for the couple of modified files (Kconfig, Makefile) and rest of the files in a separate tarball since they do not exist in the current tree and are relatively large? -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA