From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
Danny ter Haar <dth@dth.net>,
wa1ter@myrealbox.com, dth@ncc1701.cistron.net,
Netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Gigabit Kconfig problems with yesterday's update
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 08:32:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040531073211.GA4894@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405301302020.1632@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:06:53PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> is it really sane these days to split out gigabit from the "regular"
> ethernets? gigabit ethernet is getting quite a bit more common than it
> used to be, and a lot of the gigabit devices are just "standard ethernet"
> as far as the user is concerned, and in fact they are often _used_ in just
> regular 10/100Mbps setups.
Or have a gige chip that's crippled to do only 10/100, like the sungem
on my ibook.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-31 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <40B8A37D.1090802@myrealbox.com>
[not found] ` <20040530134544.GE13111@fs.tum.de>
[not found] ` <20040530143734.GA24627@dth.net>
[not found] ` <20040530094120.61b22d2e.rddunlap@osdl.org>
2004-05-30 17:51 ` [patch] Re: Gigabit Kconfig problems with yesterday's update Jeff Garzik
2004-05-30 19:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-05-30 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-30 20:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-31 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-05-31 10:00 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040531073211.GA4894@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=dth@dth.net \
--cc=dth@ncc1701.cistron.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=wa1ter@myrealbox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).