From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Gigabit Kconfig problems with yesterday's update Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 08:32:11 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040531073211.GA4894@infradead.org> References: <40B8A37D.1090802@myrealbox.com> <20040530134544.GE13111@fs.tum.de> <20040530143734.GA24627@dth.net> <20040530094120.61b22d2e.rddunlap@osdl.org> <40BA1F25.4080402@pobox.com> <20040530193706.GG13111@fs.tum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Adrian Bunk , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Randy.Dunlap" , Danny ter Haar , wa1ter@myrealbox.com, dth@ncc1701.cistron.net, Netdev , Andrew Morton Return-path: To: Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 01:06:53PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > is it really sane these days to split out gigabit from the "regular" > ethernets? gigabit ethernet is getting quite a bit more common than it > used to be, and a lot of the gigabit devices are just "standard ethernet" > as far as the user is concerned, and in fact they are often _used_ in just > regular 10/100Mbps setups. Or have a gige chip that's crippled to do only 10/100, like the sungem on my ibook.