From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: Mark Smith <random@72616e646f6d20323030342d30342d31360a.nosense.org>
Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com, Gary.Spiess@Intermec.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] natsemi update 1/4 Use assigned MAC address
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:46:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040607144654.540e7eee@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040608071252.77f9d69e.random@72616e646f6d20323030342d30342d31360a.nosense.org>
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 07:12:52 +0930
Mark Smith <random@72616e646f6d20323030342d30342d31360a.nosense.org> wrote:
> Hi Manfred, Gary, Stephen,
>
> "But: I'm not sure that the change is required. What about just
> setting the mac to 0, and the actual mac address is set from user
> space? It's possible to set the mac address with"
>
> Could I suggest if this is the solution implemented, setting the
> first octet of the MAC address to 0x02, as in a Locally Assigned
> MAC address ?
>
> If an interface with an all zero's MAC address is added to a
> bridge, running the Spanning Tree Protocol (STP), it will always
> attempt to take over as the root bridge, unless STP root bridge
> priorities are being used. This would disrupt traffic on the
> attached LAN.
Actually, it won't let you add any interface to a bridge without
a valid ether address now (ie non-zero and not multicast).
> Ideally, assigning "zero" a MAC address which has almost no
> chance of disrupting STP or any other protocol could be useful.
> Maybe fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff ?
>
> I think this would fit in with the "be conservative in what you
> send, liberal in what you receive" philosophy.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> ps, please CC on any replies, I'm not subscribed to the list yet.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-07 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-07 21:42 [PATCH] natsemi update 1/4 Use assigned MAC address Mark Smith
2004-06-07 21:46 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2004-06-07 22:11 ` Mark Smith
2004-06-07 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-04 19:51 Gary N Spiess
2004-06-06 13:30 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-06-07 17:58 ` Gary N Spiess
2004-06-07 18:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-07 21:12 ` Gary N Spiess
2004-06-08 18:31 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040607144654.540e7eee@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=Gary.Spiess@Intermec.com \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=random@72616e646f6d20323030342d30342d31360a.nosense.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).