From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Arthur Kepner <akepner@sgi.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] lockless loopback patch for 2.6 (version 2)
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:23:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040614182331.GA11862@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.56.0406141000060.479900@neteng.engr.sgi.com>
> +#define LOOPBACK_STAT_INC(field) \
> + (per_cpu_ptr(loopback_stats, smp_processor_id())->field++)
> +#define LOOPBACK_STAT_ADD(field, n) \
> + (per_cpu_ptr(loopback_stats, smp_processor_id())->field += n)
This is too complicated and not preempt safe. Use
__get_cpu_var(loopback_stats).field++;
I would also remove the macros and do this directly.
> + struct net_device_stats *stats = dev->priv;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!stats)) {
Tests for NULL don't need an unlikely, because gcc does that by
default for itself. But why can the stats here be NULL anyways?
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_RADIO
> #include <linux/wireless.h> /* Note : will define WIRELESS_EXT */
> #include <net/iw_handler.h>
> @@ -1277,6 +1278,20 @@
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#define HARD_TX_LOCK_BH(dev, cpu) { \
> + if ( dev->features && NETIF_F_LLTX == 0 ) { \
&& instead of & and missing brackets.
> + spin_lock_bh(&dev->xmit_lock); \
> + dev->xmit_lock_owner = cpu; \
> + } \
> +}
> +
> +#define HARD_TX_UNLOCK_BH(dev) { \
> + if ( dev->features && NETIF_F_LLTX == 0 ) { \
Same.
> - if (ops->reset)
> - ops->reset(qdisc);
> - if (ops->destroy)
> - ops->destroy(qdisc);
> - module_put(ops->owner);
> - if (!(qdisc->flags&TCQ_F_BUILTIN))
> - kfree(qdisc);
> +
> + call_rcu(&qdisc->q_rcu, __qdisc_destroy, qdisc);
I think you need at least a wmb() after
if (q == qdisc) {
*qp = q->next;
break;
}
Otherwise the order of updates to the readers is no guaranteed.
Also if you want to support alpha there will need to be
smp_read_barrier_depends() in the reader walking this list.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-14 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-14 17:03 [RFC/PATCH] lockless loopback patch for 2.6 (version 2) Arthur Kepner
2004-06-14 18:23 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-06-18 20:12 ` Arthur Kepner
2004-06-21 0:39 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-14 18:23 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2004-06-14 19:45 ` Arthur Kepner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040614182331.GA11862@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akepner@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).