netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerald Britton <gbritton@doomcom.org>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@pobox.com>
Cc: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@home.nl>, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:28:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040616152808.GA6270@fog.sekrit.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1087377197.25912.54.camel@sfeldma-mobl2.dsl-verizon.net>

A few comments below.

On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:13:18AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> +/* for getting/setting wireless settings */
> +struct ethtool_wx_cmd {
> +	u32	cmd;
> +	u16	nwid;		/* Wireless network ID; 0 = disabled */
> +	struct {
> +		u32	mantissa;
> +		u16	exponent;
> +	} freq;			/* Operating frequency */
> +	u32	mode;		/* Operating mode (ETH_WX_MODE_xxx) */
> +	u16	sens;		/* Sensitivity threshold (-dBm) */
> +	struct sockaddr wap;	/* Register with access point */
> +				/*   auto = 00:00:00:00:00:00 */
> +	char	essid[32];	/* ESSID; any = NULL string */

This isn't sufficient as you can have \0 bytes in the ESSID so treating it
as a null-terminated string is probably not ideal.  Also the spec specifies
32 characters as a max, but the 802.11 management IE's could support upto
255 character essid's, this probably needs a little extra thought.

> +	u32	rate;		/* Bit rate b/s; 0 = auto */
> +	u16	rts;		/* Smallest packet size for which */
> +				/* the node sends RTS; 0 = off */
> +	u16	frag;		/* Maximum fragment size; 0 = no frag */
> +	u16	tx_power;	/* Transmit power in dBm */
> +	struct { /* TODO: thit needs work */
> +		u16	limit;
> +		u32	lifetime;	/* usec */
> +	} retry;		/* MAC retransmission */
> +	u32	sec_mode;	/* Security mode (ETH_WX_SEC_MODE_xxx) */
> +	char	sec_key[32];	/* Security mode encryption key */

Similar here, is 32 characters worth of "key" enough here.

> +	/* TODO: add struct power */
> +	u32	reserved[16];
> +};

Also a quick thought to settings many drivers have in their iwpriv
commands such as operating modes .11b/.11a/.11g/auto.  A survey of a bunch
of drivers is probably worth doing to collect where the previous wireless
extentions didn't really fit their needs.

				-- Gerald

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-16 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-11 18:49 [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink Feldman, Scott
2004-06-15 16:39 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2004-06-15 17:22   ` Vladimir Kondratiev
2004-06-16  9:13   ` Scott Feldman
2004-06-16 15:28     ` Gerald Britton [this message]
2004-06-16 17:40       ` Vladimir Kondratiev
2004-06-16 17:53       ` Scott Feldman
2004-06-16 19:06         ` Gerald Britton
2004-06-17  5:57         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-06-16 17:46     ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2004-06-16 19:06       ` Scott Feldman
2004-06-16 19:49         ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-16 22:25           ` Scott Feldman
2004-06-16 20:50         ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-16 20:42       ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-16 21:36         ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-16 22:33           ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-16 23:06             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-16 23:11               ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-17 17:47               ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-17 18:23                 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-17 18:26                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-17 18:30                     ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2004-06-17 18:51                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-17 19:00                       ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-17 19:10                         ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-17 18:58                     ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-17 19:02                       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-17 19:13                         ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-17 19:34                           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-17 19:44                             ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-17 20:06                               ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-17 20:39                                 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-17 18:56                   ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-17 19:09                     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-17 19:11                       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-17 19:31                       ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-17 19:52                         ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-17 20:46                           ` Jean Tourrilhes
2004-06-18 22:11                             ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-18 22:54                               ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-16 22:48         ` Scott Feldman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-07 19:51 Gertjan van Wingerde
2004-06-07 20:52 ` Ben Greear
2004-06-07 18:33 Feldman, Scott
2004-06-07 18:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-08 11:19 ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040616152808.GA6270@fog.sekrit.org \
    --to=gbritton@doomcom.org \
    --cc=gwingerde@home.nl \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=sfeldma@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).