From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: davem@redhat.com, jmorris@redhat.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: IPsec and Path MTU
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:56:53 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040616195653.GC29781@ms2.inr.ac.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040615124334.GA25164@gondor.apana.org.au>
Hello!
> As it is, the MTU for any peer with an IPsec policy is determined
> by the MTU of its dst->path. But this is wrong because it assigns
> a single MTU to all hosts behind an IPsec gateway, even though their
> paths may well diverge beyond the gateway.
Each SA bundle referring to a dst has pmtu derived from pmtu
of that dst. So, actually, I do not understand the question.
If the policy uses the raw IP level path dst, it inherits this pmtu.
Alexey
PS. Broadcast: guys, please, tell someone to Herbert, my e-mail is banned
at his server:
... while talking to arnor.apana.org.au.:
>>> RCPT To:<herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
<<< 550 mail from 194.67.69.111 rejected: administrative prohibition
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-16 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-15 12:43 IPsec and Path MTU Herbert Xu
2004-06-15 14:50 ` Michael Richardson
2004-06-16 11:43 ` Herbert Xu
2004-06-16 14:43 ` Michael Richardson
2004-06-18 7:35 ` Glen Turner
2004-06-16 12:10 ` Herbert Xu
2004-06-16 14:12 ` James Morris
2004-06-16 20:23 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2004-06-16 20:49 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-16 23:11 ` Herbert Xu
2004-06-17 17:58 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-17 21:31 ` Herbert Xu
2004-06-17 22:22 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-17 23:09 ` Herbert Xu
2004-06-16 19:56 ` Alexey Kuznetsov [this message]
2004-06-16 23:13 ` Herbert Xu
2004-06-17 19:01 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2004-06-17 21:38 ` Herbert Xu
2004-06-17 22:29 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-17 23:12 ` Herbert Xu
2004-06-17 23:14 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-17 23:18 ` Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <20040618202551.GA2733@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
2004-06-18 22:21 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040616195653.GC29781@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--to=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).