From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Angelo Dell'Aera <buffer@antifork.org>
Subject: TCP congestion control article
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:39:53 +0200
Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20040625123953.1d42b556.buffer@antifork.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Return-path: <linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org>
To: Linux-Net <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Hi all,
I just want to point out to you a really interesting article published
by  two  members   of  my  research  group.  The   paper  is  entitled
"Performance  Evaluation and  Comparison  of Westwood+,  New Reno  and
Vegas TCP  Congestion Control" and  it aims at evaluating  these three
algorithms in really different scenarios.

You may find it at

http://buffer.antifork.org/westwood/ccr_v31.pdf


Best regards.

 
- --

Angelo Dell'Aera 'buffer' 
Antifork Research, Inc.	  	http://buffer.antifork.org

PGP information in e-mail header


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA3AD5pONIzxnBXKIRArSJAJ9AZoybNpTpLxj2XPZ3IBm/zfgfzwCguu3m
+XKmZTP/fvy73EM5MHOUY6g=
=0DyV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----