From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix tcp_default_win_scale. Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:17:31 -0700 Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040706131731.540dd5fd.davem@redhat.com> References: <32886.63.170.215.71.1088564087.squirrel@www.osdl.org> <20040629222751.392f0a82.davem@redhat.com> <20040630152750.2d01ca51@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040630153049.3ca25b76.davem@redhat.com> <20040701133738.301b9e46@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040701140406.62dfbc2a.davem@redhat.com> <20040702013225.GA24707@conectiva.com.br> <20040706093503.GA8147@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20040706114741.1bf98bbe@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040706185856.GN18841@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Jan-Benedict Glaw In-Reply-To: <20040706185856.GN18841@lug-owl.de> List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:58:56 +0200 Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-06 11:47:41 -0700, Stephen Hemminger > wrote in message <20040706114741.1bf98bbe@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>: > > > I propose that the following that will avoid sending window scaling that > > is big enough to break in these cases unless the tcp_rmem has been increased. > > It will keep default configuration from blowing in a corrupt world. > > I'm not sure if this is the right way to react. I'd think it's okay to > give the user the possibility to scale the window so that it works with > his b0rk3d firewall, but default behavior should be to do whatever the > protocol dictates/allows. I totally agree, and that's why the sysctl is there for people to tweak as they desire. Jan, any particular reason you removed so much stuff (in particular netdev@oss.sgi.com) from the CC: list in your posting here?