From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernd Schubert Subject: Re: 2.6.7 oops, sk98lin related? Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:08:38 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200407221908.41468.bernd-schubert@web.de> References: <200407221101.16388.bernd-schubert@web.de> <20040722150314.GB13195@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: To: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <20040722150314.GB13195@infradead.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > > is this an sk98lin oops, maybe related to your patches or is it a > > completely different problem? > > I don't think there's skge patches from me in 2.6.7 yet, but certainl= y not > in that area ;-) Well just remember, on 20040704 you send me a 'huge patch' which should= also=20 fix our module unload problems. > > This is just a big memory allocation failing, not an oops anyway. Unfortunality I began to capture via serial console only a few hour aft= er the=20 server crashed. As there is also nothing in the logs, I don't have the=20 beginning trace of the problems. Since there is something about sk98 in almost all traces, I thought it = might=20 be a sk98lin problem. Anyway, do you have an idea what might have cause this memory allocatio= n=20 problem? Thanks, Bernd --=20 Bernd Schubert Physikalisch Chemisches Institut / Theoretische Chemie Universit=E4t Heidelberg INF 229 69120 Heidelberg e-mail: bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de