From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [Fwd: pcmcia ether drivers can't be unloaded] Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:50:24 +0100 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040728165024.A8475@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <41068BEF.7010200@pobox.com> <20040727233614.B30782@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20040727171929.17858c7b.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, greg@kroah.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040727171929.17858c7b.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 05:19:29PM -0700 Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 05:19:29PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > I totally disagree. This is a bogus argument for two reasons: You may disagree, that is your option. However, facts are facts - this is how the PCMCIA layer currently works, and short of rewriting the whole damned thing it isn't going to change. Sorry. PS, I'm on holiday for the next week or so, so don't expect anything to happen, even if you rant and rave about it. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core