From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: pcmcia ether drivers can't be unloaded]
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:02:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040802200210.A9498@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040728085419.773c4d94.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 08:54:19AM -0700
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 08:54:19AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:50:24 +0100
> Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 05:19:29PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > > I totally disagree. This is a bogus argument for two reasons:
> >
> > You may disagree, that is your option. However, facts are facts -
> > this is how the PCMCIA layer currently works, and short of rewriting
> > the whole damned thing it isn't going to change. Sorry.
>
> Stephen offered a solution, moving this stray refcount into a toplevel
> pcmcia bus type object. We are not constrained by how the PCMCIA layer
> currently works, just as we were not constrained a year ago by how the
> generic network device handling worked when it was totally broken in
> this area. We just fixed it instead of whining.
Sorry, I'm not the one whining here. I just have _ZERO_ time at the moment
because I'm still in Canada and only have sporadic access to stuff.
Sorry if this doesn't meet your requirements, but this is the best I can
offer you at the moment.
In short, my best and only answer is "tough, live with it until I can
investigate."
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-02 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <41068BEF.7010200@pobox.com>
2004-07-27 22:36 ` [Fwd: pcmcia ether drivers can't be unloaded] Russell King
2004-07-28 0:19 ` David S. Miller
2004-07-28 15:50 ` Russell King
2004-07-28 15:54 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-02 19:02 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-08-07 11:09 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040802200210.A9498@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).