From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH] b44 1GB DMA workaround (was: b44: add 47xx support) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:39:19 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040803183919.2990d045.davem@redhat.com> References: <200407232335.37809.jolt@tuxbox.org> <20040726141128.GA5435@ee.oulu.fi> <20040804003108.GA10445@ee.oulu.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, jolt@tuxbox.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Pekka Pietikainen In-Reply-To: <20040804003108.GA10445@ee.oulu.fi> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 03:31:08 +0300 Pekka Pietikainen wrote: > + if(mapping+len > B44_DMA_MASK) { > + /* Chip can't handle DMA to/from >1GB, use bounce buffer */ > + pci_unmap_single(bp->pdev, mapping, len,PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); > + memcpy(bp->tx_bufs+entry*TX_PKT_BUF_SZ,skb->data,skb->len); > + skb->data=bp->tx_bufs+entry*TX_PKT_BUF_SZ; > + mapping = pci_map_single(bp->pdev, skb->data, len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); > + } Changing skb->data is not legal. Please implement this in such a way that skb->data does not get modified. By modifying skb->data you will break things such as packet sniffers and netfilter, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. :-) I would suggest merely freeing up this TX skb, and marking the entry in the b44 software state with some dummy skb pointer such as (void *) 0x1UL or something like that to indicate this case.