From: Roger Luethi <rl@hellgate.ch>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [2/3] via-rhine: de-isolate PHY
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 23:54:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040808215458.GA21994@k3.hellgate.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41169546.5000308@colorfullife.com>
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 23:04:06 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Roger Luethi wrote:
> >>I know that PHYs go into isolate mode if the startup id is wired to 0,
> >
> >Wouldn't that be s/go/can go/ ?
> >
> I don't have the MII standard, my knowledge is from the DP83840A specs:
> The pin description contains a section about the phy ids:
> During power up five pins are latched to determine the initial phy address.
> Then the following sentence in bold: "An address selection of all zeros
> (00000) will result in a PHY isolation condition".
I suppose all PHYs do that. Even if they don't, though, I should be
safe as long as I de-isolate unconditionally (instead of testing for
phy_id==0).
> I've reread the DP specs and I now think that your current patch is
> sufficient:
> The isolate state is independant from the phy address - a non-zero phy
> can be in isolate mode and the phy zero can be non-isolated. The phy id
Stands to reason. A PHY that can't get out of isolation wouldn't be
very useful.
> If this is really true then handling phy 0 is trivial:
> First scan 1-31. If nothing found: try 0. If a phy is found: clear the
> isolate bit and then use phy 0.
Makes sense. The Rhine is actually pretty neat in that regard, I've
been able to drop the PHY scanning entirely.
Roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-08 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-08 19:53 [2/3] via-rhine: de-isolate PHY Manfred Spraul
2004-08-08 20:05 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-08 21:04 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-08-08 21:54 ` Roger Luethi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-08 14:02 [0/3] via-rhine: experimental patches Roger Luethi
2004-08-08 14:02 ` [2/3] via-rhine: de-isolate PHY Roger Luethi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040808215458.GA21994@k3.hellgate.ch \
--to=rl@hellgate.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).