From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
James Ketrenos <jketreno@linux.intel.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Jeff Chua <jeffchua@silk.corp.fedex.com>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ipw2100 wireless driver
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:22:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040811172222.GI10100@louise.pinerecords.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040811181142.A30309@infradead.org>
On Aug-11 2004, Wed, 18:11 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:02:08PM +0200, Tomas Szepe wrote:
> > Agreed. But the point is, in the actual case of ipw2100, will the removal
> > of 40 or so lines of code justify killing the functionality for those (lots)
> > that use it?
>
> Yes.
Well, "I'm not young enough to know everything." Too bad.
And btw, mails to hch@infradead.org bounce.
--
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-11 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-14 11:41 ipw2100 wireless driver Pavel Machek
2004-07-14 11:48 ` Jeff Chua
2004-07-14 11:55 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-09 20:15 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-08-10 5:02 ` Jeff Chua
2004-08-10 6:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-10 10:16 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-10 10:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-11 12:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-11 17:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-11 20:27 ` Pavel Machek
2004-08-11 22:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-11 10:16 ` James Ketrenos
2004-08-11 10:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-11 10:53 ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-08-11 10:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-11 16:21 ` James Ketrenos
2004-08-11 16:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-08-11 16:33 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-08-11 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-11 17:02 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-08-11 17:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-11 17:22 ` Tomas Szepe [this message]
2004-08-11 18:55 ` John Stoffel
2004-08-11 23:55 ` Jeff Chua
2004-08-12 3:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2004-08-11 17:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-07-14 12:30 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-07-14 12:27 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-14 13:15 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-07-14 13:42 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040811172222.GI10100@louise.pinerecords.com \
--to=szepe@pinerecords.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jeffchua@silk.corp.fedex.com \
--cc=jketreno@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).