From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Tourrilhes Subject: Re: Updated WE-18 (WPA) proposal Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:42:15 -0700 Sender: hostap-bounces+gldh-hostap-597=gmane.org@shmoo.com Message-ID: <20040830174215.GA32132@bougret.hpl.hp.com> References: <20040830045441.GA7415@jm.kir.nu> <20040830165026.GD29492@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <413363CB.7060807@pobox.com> Reply-To: jt@hpl.hp.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Jouni Malinen , hostap@shmoo.com, Pedro Ramalhais Return-path: To: Jeff Garzik Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <413363CB.7060807@pobox.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: hostap-bounces+gldh-hostap-597=gmane.org@shmoo.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > > Don't worry, I'll fix that. Anyway, WE-17 is pending in Jeff's > >tree, and I don't think he will make major changes to it. > > > hehe :) > > Yep, it's merged in netdev-2.6 (and thus -mm as well), and queued for > upstream. Thanks ;-) > FWIW any 'radical' wireless changes will go into wireless-2.6. There is > still the stable upstream branch, to which WE patches can continue to be > applied... If you don't mind, I would like a bit more understanding about how much is "radical" and how much is not. I would personally put that around "breaking backward compatibility", but you may have other ideas. Also, I'm not clear how the stuff in wireless-2.6 is supposed to trickle into the other trees (netdev-2.6, -mm and Linus's), and how to better link it with the CVS of the various drivers involved. > Jeff Have fun... Jean