From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: HELP for dccp implementation. Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 23:48:05 -0300 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20040902024805.GA23844@conectiva.com.br> References: <412CC269.8080907@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <1093454747.1034.85.camel@jzny.localdomain> <4135A32A.4030901@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> <20040901133709.3637d63d.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Zhikui Chen , hadi@cyberus.ca, dccp@ietf.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040901133709.3637d63d.davem@davemloft.net> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:37:09PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: > On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 12:23:38 +0200 > Zhikui Chen wrote: > > > If I assign a value such as 0x ee9fbc00 to sk in dccp_rcv (before lookup > > calling), and comment lookkup calling, I get a error report from > > bh_lock_sock(sk) calling inside dccp_rcv, which error report is > > spin_is_locked on uninitialized spinlock ee9fbc00, and spin_lock > > (:ee9fbc00) already locked by /73. > > > > Do you know its reason? Thanks, > > Zhikui, are you working together with Arnaldo using his > code base, like we suggested to you? Or are you working > still on your own code? Dave, I've been quite busy lately with some other projects and haven't been able to colaborate with Zhikui, I hope to change this situation soon. Regards, - Arnaldo