From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc1+bk: assertion tcp_get_pcount failed at
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:08:52 -0700
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <20040910140852.7a970f3c.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20040909111233.GA3987@steel.home>
	<20040910033055.GA26790@gondor.apana.org.au>
	<20040909222542.7a30c0e4.davem@davemloft.net>
	<41414C3D.2090606@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, fork0@users.sourceforge.net,
        netdev@oss.sgi.com
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <41414C3D.2090606@us.ibm.com>
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 23:39:57 -0700
Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> > Herbert did you see my division fix I made today for
> > tso_factor calculation?  I was dividing by the TSO mss
> > instead of the normal one :-)
> 
> Dave, I'm just catching up with the most recent
> kernel (from 2.6.8.1 and a hiatus), and I believe
> the fixes you refer to as well as the change in
> tcp_init_cwnd (tso_factor etc) make TSO consistent
> with the standard now.
> 
> That correct? (And thanks, much appreciated, I was
> about to fiddle with the same stuff :)).

That's absolutely correct and this was the purpose
of these changes.